H&M, Decathlon accused of unclear sustainability claims in the Netherlands

“Decathlon and H&M describe their products with generic terms such as ‘ecodesign’ and ‘conscious’ without clearly spelling out their sustainability benefits,” wrote CRA in a statement. As a result of the investigation, both retailers have pledged they will change their working methods and will inform customers more effectively, a commitment that the Dutch CRA will be monitoring for two years.“Companies that promote their products with sustainability claims must ensure that these are correct, clear and verifiable. Otherwise, consumers will be misled,” added the CRA, which did not however impose sanctions on either retailer.

At the same time, Decathlon and H&M have respectively made donations of €400,000 and €500,000 to various organisations advocating sustainable development, especially in the apparel sector.Contacted by FashionNetwork.com, Swedish group H&M acknowledged that its website’s sustainability information “could have been provided in a clearer and more comprehensive way,” and stated that “changes are under way,” with the goal of sharing more comprehensive data on its efforts towards sustainable development. The group also pointed out that the issues raised by the Dutch CRA “did not concern the dissemination of false information.”In addition, H&M has decided to remove from its e-shop the mention ‘conscious choice’, which characterises a number of its products. An ongoing job that will be completed by the end of October.As for Decathlon, it stated on its Dutch site that it is fully cooperating with the CRA and is currently working to improve how it “communicates about eco-design,” a term that refers, among other things, to material choices and production process optimisation.Recently, other fashion brands have been singled out for their poor communication regarding the supposed sustainable nature of their products. As was the case of British fashion e-tailer Asos, the subject of an investigation by the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority, following which it removed the ‘responsible edit’ section from its site. In June, Zero Waste France filed a complaint against Adidas and New Balance, claiming their commitment to environmentally friendly practices is “mere window dressing.”

Related Posts

Balenciaga to set up its first leather goods factory in Italy

“The new factory is intended to support the fashion house’s expansion plans,”said the brand in a statement, sharing that it will continue to rely on its current…

40k+ UK retail jobs lost since 2010 says union

The figures were released as the last Wilko stores closed their doors for the final time, costing 12,500 workers their jobs after the chain collapsed. GMB on Monday…

Former Tesco executives encouraged profit overstatement, misled stock market, court told

With a motive to support the share price of Britain’s biggest retailer, secure huge compensation packages and retain their jobs, the two executives “pressurised or coerced” unidentified…

Going under the knife in China’s plastic surgery stampede

Plastic surgery is booming in China, fuelled by rising incomes, growing Western influences, and the imperative of looking good on social media.Some parents are even paying for…

Ganni Slouchy Boots are first product to use major new leather alternative

And they’ve also joined with Danish contemporary brand Ganni to make a splash with the new product. The trio said they’ll “bring this next-generation material to the market…

Global garment makers unite to demand better terms from retailers

The suppliers hope their united front will prevent retailers from playing them off against each other in search of more lenient terms after suffering from widespread cancellations…